Home > Events > Grad Seminars > Nathan Hill (UC Berkeley/University of London) | Why does the Tibetan verb for ‘eat’ show an ‘a’ to ‘o’ ablaut from present to past (pres. za, past zos) whereas most Tibetan verbs (e.g. ‘kill’, pres. gsod, past bsad) show the opposite?

This event has passed.

Nathan Hill (UC Berkeley/University of London) | Why does the Tibetan verb for ‘eat’ show an ‘a’ to ‘o’ ablaut from present to past (pres. za, past zos) whereas most Tibetan verbs (e.g. ‘kill’, pres. gsod, past bsad) show the opposite?

Name: Nathan Hill (UC Berkeley/University of London) | Why does the Tibetan verb for ‘eat’ show an ‘a’ to ‘o’ ablaut from present to past (pres. za, past zos) whereas most Tibetan verbs (e.g. ‘kill’, pres. gsod, past bsad) show the opposite?
Start: 2016-01-21T18:00:00-08:00
End: 2016-01-21T20:00:00-08:00
Location: Dodd 74

Jan 21, 2016 @ 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm

Dodd 74, 405 Hilgard Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90095 United States

Details

Date:: Jan 21, 2016
Time:: 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Event Category:: Grad Seminars
Event Tags:: Morphology, Tibetan

Venue

: Dodd 74
: 405 Hilgard Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90095 United States

Nathan Hill (UC Berkeley/University of London) | Why does the Tibetan verb for ‘eat’ show an ‘a’ to ‘o’ ablaut from present to past (pres. za, past zos) whereas most Tibetan verbs (e.g. ‘kill’, pres. gsod, past bsad) show the opposite?

Details

Venue

Recent Posts